Quine on Aristotle on Identity

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Quine on Identity

In a first section, we discuss Quine’s claim according to which identity is a logical notion. We point out that Quine mixes up various types of identities: trivial (or diagonal) identity, Leibniz identity, etc.; and this leads him to commit several mistakes. In a second section, we review Quine’s criticisms to various philosophers (Wittgenstein, Whitehead, Leibniz, etc.), who according to him m...

متن کامل

Quine on Ethics

1. INTRODUCTION W.V. Quine has expressed a fairly conventional form of non-cognitivism in those of his writings that concern the status of moral judgments. For instance, in Quine (1981), he argues that ethics, as compared with science, is 'methodologically infirm'. The reason is that while science is responsive to observation, and therefore 'retains some title to a correspondence theory of trut...

متن کامل

constructing gender identity through narratives based on hallidays metafunctions

هویت, شکل دادن و بازنمایی آن در گفتمان, توجه بسیاری از محققان این رشته را به خود جلب کرده است. تحقیق حاضر بر شکل دادن به هویت جنسیتی هشت تن از دانشجویان ایرانی مشغول به تحصیل در دوره کارشناسی ارشد از طریق بررسی روایات آنان از تجربیات شخصی, متمرکز شده است. تحلیل داده ها در این تحقیق مشتمل بر سه بخش است: بخش اول شامل کدگذاری موضوعی روایات است که بر اساس آن هویت جنسیتی شرکت کنندگان در تحقیق بر اسا...

15 صفحه اول

Quine on Indeterminacy

W.V. Quine’s thesis of the indeterminacy of translation is the theory which launched a thousand doctorates. During the 1970s it sometimes seemed to be as firmly entrenched a dogma among North American philosophers as the existence of God was among medieval theologians. Although now subject to much more by way of critical appraisal, Quine’s work is still, rightly, at the forefront of contemporar...

متن کامل

On Quine on Carnap on Ontology

terms, but merely an explanation of my reaction to those objections [to the use of such terms] and of my impression that no sufficiently compelling reasons for them were given. Nevertheless, I thought that these objections deserved to be given careful and serious attention. This I did in my article “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”.39 Notice that Carnap denied that the objections his empiri...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Crítica (México D. F. En línea)

سال: 1985

ISSN: 1870-4905,0011-1503

DOI: 10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1985.563